Is astrology a science or superstition?

Astrology is not considered a science by the scientific community. Science is characterized by a systematic and evidence-based approach to understanding the natural world, involving hypotheses, experiments, and empirical verification. Astrology lacks the empirical evidence, testable hypotheses, and scientific methodology required for classification as a scientific discipline.

Astrology is often categorized as a pseudoscience or a belief system that lacks a basis in scientific principles. The fundamental premises of astrology, such as the influence of celestial bodies on human affairs and personality traits, are not supported by scientific evidence, and the proposed mechanisms are not consistent with our understanding of physics and biology.

While astrology may have cultural, historical, or personal significance for some individuals, it doesn't meet the criteria of a scientific discipline. It is important to distinguish between science, which is based on empirical evidence and the scientific method, and belief systems or practices that may fall outside the realm of scientific validation.

On the other hand, astrology can be considered a form of cultural or personal belief, and individuals may engage with it for various reasons, including entertainment, self-reflection, or cultural tradition. The classification of astrology as a superstition depends on one's perspective. Superstitions typically involve beliefs in supernatural causality or ritualistic practices without a basis in empirical evidence, and some aspects of astrology may align with this definition.