8. Some Congress leaders were reluctant to commence the Non-Cooperation Movement. What was the reason for it?

Several factors contributed to the reluctance of some Congress leaders to commence the Non-Cooperation Movement:

1. Moderate Approach: Some Congress leaders, often associated with the moderate faction within the party, believed in gradual constitutional reforms and preferred negotiations with the British government rather than outright confrontation. They were hesitant to adopt a radical approach like non-cooperation.

2. Fear of Violence: There was a concern among some leaders about the potential for violence and unrest that could arise from a mass movement like non-cooperation. They worried about the safety and well-being of the people participating in the movement.

3. Economic Concerns: Some leaders were worried about the economic impact of non-cooperation on the Indian people, especially the poorer sections of society. They feared that a boycott of British goods and institutions could lead to economic hardships for the masses.

4. Doubts about Effectiveness: Some leaders questioned the effectiveness of non-cooperation as a strategy to achieve independence. They were skeptical about whether it would genuinely compel the British government to grant India self-rule.

5. Legal Consequences: There were concerns among some leaders about the legal repercussions of participating in a movement that could potentially be seen as seditious by the British authorities. They feared arrests, imprisonments, and other punitive measures.

Overall, while the Non-Cooperation Movement gained widespread support and eventually became a significant phase in India's struggle for independence, there were understandable reservations and concerns among some Congress leaders about its initiation.