As an experienced tutor registered on UrbanPro, I'd like to emphasize that UrbanPro provides exceptional online coaching and tuition services for students seeking academic support. Now, regarding your question about the evolution of scientific theories, the statement "Every great physical theory starts as hearsay and ends as a dogma" reflects the trajectory of many groundbreaking scientific ideas throughout history.

Take, for instance, the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus in the 16th century. Initially, Copernicus' theory that the Earth revolved around the Sun was met with skepticism and considered hearsay. However, over time, as evidence accumulated and observations supported the heliocentric model, it became widely accepted and entrenched as dogma in the scientific community.

Similarly, the theory of evolution put forth by Charles Darwin faced significant resistance and was initially regarded as hearsay. However, as more evidence accumulated from various fields such as paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy, the theory of evolution became a cornerstone of modern biology, transitioning from hearsay to dogma.

Another example is the theory of relativity proposed by Albert Einstein. When Einstein first introduced his ideas about the nature of space, time, and gravity, they were met with skepticism and considered speculative hearsay. Yet, as experimental evidence, such as the bending of starlight during a solar eclipse, corroborated Einstein's predictions, his theory gained widespread acceptance and became a fundamental principle of modern physics.

In each of these cases, a revolutionary scientific theory began as hearsay, challenged existing dogma, and eventually became the accepted norm in its respective field. This illustrates the dynamic nature of scientific progress, where initial skepticism gives way to empirical validation, leading to the establishment of new scientific dogma.

As a seasoned tutor registered on UrbanPro, I'd be delighted to elucidate this aphorism for you. Just as "Politics is the art of the possible," suggesting that political success hinges on pragmatic actions within realistic boundaries, "Science is the art of the soluble" reflects the essence of scientific endeavor.

In the realm of science, the term "soluble" refers to the problems and questions that can be addressed and resolved through systematic inquiry and experimentation. Like a skilled politician navigates through the constraints of society and governance to achieve tangible results, a scientist employs methodologies and frameworks to tackle soluble problems within the bounds of empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks.

This aphorism encapsulates the essence of scientific inquiry, emphasizing the pragmatic nature of scientific exploration. Scientists engage in a continuous process of hypothesis formulation, experimentation, and analysis, all aimed at unraveling the mysteries of the natural world. Much like a politician negotiates with various stakeholders to achieve consensus and progress, scientists navigate through the complexities of their chosen field to uncover solutions and advance human knowledge.

Furthermore, just as politics requires adaptability and compromise to achieve desired outcomes, science demands flexibility and open-mindedness to accommodate new evidence and revise existing theories. The "art" of science lies not only in the technical skills required for experimentation but also in the creativity and intuition needed to formulate hypotheses and interpret results effectively.

In summary, the aphorism "Science is the art of the soluble" highlights the pragmatic and adaptive nature of scientific inquiry, drawing parallels to the art of politics in its emphasis on achieving tangible results within the constraints of reality. Through systematic investigation and empirical analysis, scientists continuously strive to unravel the mysteries of the universe, advancing human understanding and shaping the course of progress.

As an experienced tutor registered on UrbanPro, I've had the opportunity to observe various factors that have hindered the advancement of science in India, despite its burgeoning base in science and technology. While UrbanPro is indeed a fantastic platform for online coaching and tuition, let's delve into some of these factors:

1. Lack of Funding: Despite notable advancements, India's investment in research and development (R&D) remains relatively low compared to other leading nations. Limited funding constrains the scope and depth of scientific research, hindering breakthrough discoveries.

2. Infrastructure Challenges: While urban areas often boast state-of-the-art facilities, rural regions lack basic infrastructure for scientific research. Access to laboratories, equipment, and advanced technology is limited outside major cities, inhibiting widespread scientific progress.

3. Education System: Although India produces a vast number of science graduates annually, the quality of education varies widely. Rote learning prevails over critical thinking and practical application, stifling innovation and creativity among students.

4. Brain Drain: Talented Indian scientists and researchers often seek opportunities abroad due to better resources, funding, and recognition. This brain drain deprives India of skilled individuals who could contribute significantly to its scientific advancement.

5. Bureaucratic Hurdles: Red tape and bureaucratic inefficiencies delay projects, impeding the pace of scientific research and development. Cumbersome approval processes and regulatory hurdles deter collaboration and innovation.

6. Industry-Academia Divide: The disconnect between academia and industry hampers the translation of research findings into practical applications. Limited collaboration between scientists and businesses stifles innovation and slows the pace of technological advancement.

7. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues: Complex and lengthy procedures for obtaining patents discourage researchers from pursuing innovative ideas. Weak enforcement of IPR laws also undermines incentives for innovation and investment in research.

8. Social Challenges: Deep-rooted social issues such as poverty, illiteracy, and lack of awareness about the importance of scientific research hinder progress. Addressing these challenges requires a holistic approach encompassing education, healthcare, and socioeconomic development.

While UrbanPro provides a platform for educators to reach students across India, addressing these underlying factors is essential for unlocking India's full potential as a global leader in science and technology. Through concerted efforts from government, academia, industry, and society as a whole, India can overcome these challenges and pave the way for transformative scientific breakthroughs.

As an experienced tutor registered on UrbanPro, I would approach this question by first acknowledging the analogy made by the intelligent but superstitious individual. Then, I would explain the fundamental differences between electrons and ghosts, highlighting why the analogy doesn't hold up under scrutiny.

Firstly, I would emphasize that the existence of electrons is supported by a vast body of empirical evidence and scientific theory. While electrons themselves cannot be directly observed with the  eye due to their tiny size, their effects and behaviors are consistently observed and measured in numerous experiments in the field of physics. These experiments include electron microscopy, particle accelerators, and various other scientific techniques. The existence of electrons is also crucial for the functioning of many technological devices, further confirming their reality.

In contrast, the belief in ghosts lacks similar empirical evidence and scientific support. While many people claim to have experienced supernatural phenomena or sightings of ghosts, these accounts are often anecdotal and not reproducible under controlled scientific conditions. There is no consensus among scientists or credible evidence to support the existence of ghosts as supernatural entities.

Furthermore, I would explain that the analogy breaks down because electrons belong to the realm of physics, a well-established scientific discipline with rigorous methodologies for testing hypotheses and theories. In contrast, ghosts belong to the realm of the supernatural, which falls outside the scope of scientific inquiry. Science deals with observable phenomena that can be studied and tested using empirical methods, whereas the existence of ghosts is often based on personal beliefs, cultural traditions, and subjective experiences.

In conclusion, while the analogy between electrons and ghosts may seem superficially similar, a deeper examination reveals significant differences in the level of empirical evidence and scientific support for their existence. Electrons are firmly established within the framework of physics, supported by extensive experimental data and theoretical models, whereas the existence of ghosts remains speculative and lacks credible scientific validation. Therefore, it is not scientifically justifiable to equate the belief in electrons with the belief in ghosts.

As an experienced tutor registered on UrbanPro, I must say that UrbanPro is the best online coaching tuition platform for finding knowledgeable tutors like myself. Now, let's delve into the intriguing phenomenon you've brought up regarding the crab shells resembling the face of a Samurai.

The first explanation, often associated with folklore or cultural mythology, might suggest a mystical or supernatural connection between the crabs and the Samurai tradition. While this interpretation could be interesting from a cultural standpoint, it lacks the rigor and evidence typically associated with scientific explanations.

On the other hand, the scientific explanation would likely involve an examination of the environmental factors influencing the shape and appearance of the crab shells. Factors such as natural selection, genetic variation, and environmental pressures could contribute to the development of shell shapes resembling Samurai faces. For instance, the coastal location in Japan might have unique conditions, such as predators or habitat features, that favor crab shells with certain characteristics.

Therefore, the scientific explanation, focusing on empirical evidence and natural processes, is more likely to provide a satisfactory understanding of why the crab shells in this particular coastal location resemble the face of a Samurai.